Hello all,
I forgot to update you last week, but for those who have been wondering, yes I did pass my driving theory test, despite my concerns about hazard perception.
I have always been a massive swot, so by the time I say down for my test I had spent weeks working my way through textbooks, apps and flashcards, and taken numerous mock tests online. I got to the stage where I could reliably pass the multiple-choice segment, but I only ever got average marks for hazard perception, despite assuming that I’d sail through this part. After all, unlike many people taking the test, I had several years of real-life hazard perception training under my belt, courtesy of my courier job.
Scanning the horizon for potential threats was something I’d got good enough at to actively enjoy it, so I couldn’t understand why I was barely scraping through the online tests. Eventually I worked out that in some cases I was anticipating the hazard too early (and therefore getting zero marks), and in other cases I was being penalised for clicking too often. (Danger lurks at every turn, I would argue.) In the end I didn’t get a particularly high mark for the test, but I passed, and that’s all that matters.
But ever since then I’ve been thinking about how I read the road. My driving lessons seems to have reinvigorated a skillset I once developed to a very high level, but haven’t had the chance to use very much in recent years. Riding a fixed-gear bike at high speed through busy traffic is quite a specific talent, and not one that has very many useful or lucrative real-world applications – but oh god, I loved it so much while I did it. It was intoxicating to feel so capable; to be surrounded by what many would consider chaos, and yet somehow to be in control.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Unfinished Journeys to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.